Moving from the Creative Cloud

Alternatives to Adobe Creative Cloud Applications (Podcast 672)

For many years, I’ve used Adobe’s Master Suite, and when the Creative Cloud was introduced, I gladly started a subscription. Due to my style of travel, sometimes not having access to the Internet for up to 7 weeks, I also helped Adobe to shape their license checking and grace period lengths, so as not to leave photographers in the field high and dry.

I have huge respect for what Adobe has done for photography and indeed many creative areas, but for a number of reasons I’ve decided to reduce my Creative Cloud subscription to the Photographer’s Plan, and today I’d like to walk you through my reasoning and decision process.

Before I go on, I’d like to mention that I am one of the relatively few people that really used many of the Creative Cloud applications. I used Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Premiere Pro, Audition, occasionally After Effects, and until 2016, Lightroom was my goto photo editing and asset management tool. I was getting value from the Creative Cloud, and when I was paying ¥5,378 which is about $51 per month, I felt as though it was a relatively good deal.

So what happened?

Well, it was really a collection of things that started me thinking that I wanted to move away from the Creative Cloud. The first thing was a price increase that happened without me noticing, until after I got back from this year’s Namibia Tour. I might have received a notification email, but I didn’t recall seeing one, but then I noticed as I did my accounts that the price had been hiked to ¥6,134 which is about $58.30 at the current exchange rate.


The price increase started me wondering if I had any alternatives, but before I thought much more about that, I noticed a new product from a company that I’ve been watching closely, and that was Affinity Publisher, a direct competitor for Adobe’s InDesign, which is the product that I have been using for many years to create ebooks and my tour guidebooks etc.


I have taken courses on InDesign, as it’s a pretty complicated program to use, but even so, every other week or so, as I was creating my weekly eBook for the MBP Pro members, I found myself stuck on something, and what I could do in an hour when things go well, would all of a sudden take me three hours, and I have frankly counted on being able to make these ebooks in around an hour, not three, so from a business perspective, this hits me pretty hard.

So I decided to pick up a copy of Affinity Publisher and see how it faired against the industry-standard eBook designing software package, InDesign. I opened Affinity Publisher and very quickly got started creating my weekly eBook, and although I literally could not do very much at all in InDesign before taking an online course, I finished my eBook in around two hours in Publisher, and that included deciding on my layout and figuring out how to do the very few things that weren’t completely obvious.

A Revelation!

Most of what I looked for was exactly where I would have expected it to be. It felt so natural to use, that I felt myself chuckling to myself a number of times as things just came together so easily. At least 10 times I mentioned to my wife that this is how InDesign should have been designed, or why didn’t Adobe do it like this. Affinity Publisher is worlds more intuitive, and I believe my weekly eBooks look better for it as well.

This revelation got me thinking. I started to wonder how many other Creative Cloud applications I could realistically replace, and pretty much straight away bought Affinity’s other two products, Affinity Photo, which is a Photoshop replacement, and Affinity Designer, which replaces Illustrator. Not a bad start!

I Have Audacity!

The other Adobe application that I relied heavily on was Audition, as I’ve been using that to record the Podcast audio each week for the last few years. I had a really good look around for some alternatives, and even tried to record into some of the music production or DAW software that I already own, but none of it really suited my needs. Then I decided to check out Audacity, which is a free, open-source application for recording audio. I’ve been aware of Audacity for many years, but never thought to really give it a try.


Having taken it for a spin, I found myself once again wondering why Audition didn’t work like that. There are things that Audition does better, and it’s probably now taking me a little longer to produce my podcast because of that, but as a means to an end, I don’t mind, and I am gradually improving my workflow again, so all is good on the audio front.

Switched From Lightroom 3 Years Ago

As I mentioned, I jumped ship from Lightroom to Capture One Pro three years ago anyway, so that was now out of the equation, and the reason for switching was pure and simply better image quality, but if I was still with Lightroom, I’d have probably been looking for an alternative anyway as Adobe move Lightroom to the cloud and make the regular Lightroom “Classic”. I understand that they are saying that Lightroom is not being end-of-lifed, but I simply do not like anything that gets termed classic when it really isn’t. Although this may be just my impression, I’d have moved away from Lightroom before now anyway.

Video Production Alternative

The final thing that I needed to replace was Premiere Pro and After Effects for video production, and for the record, I have at this point not actually replaced them, but because I haven’t had a project that requires me to invest in another package yet, my current plan is to buy Final Cut Pro if I need something in the near future. Final Cut Pro is a very expensive package though. At this point, I have been able to replace the first four products for less than the cost of one month of the Creative Cloud for each product. Although Audacity is free, I actually donated $50 to the team to help with future development, so that’s again about how much I was paying for the Creative Cloud for one month.

I actually have a feeling that the Affinity team is probably working really hard on their next Creative Cloud killer, which will probably be a Premiere Pro alternative, so I’m hoping that they release that before I have to pay for Final Cut Pro, or any other package that I might decide on later.

The Stinger

So, the stage was set. I had an alternative solution for everything either already purchased or decided but waiting to pull the trigger on. I then went over to Adobe’s web site to see how easy it was going to be to cancel my subscription and was horrified to find that not only had I missed the email about the price increase, but I believe I never received notification that June was my yearly renewal month, and Adobe wanted around $333 before they’d let me cancel my Creative Cloud subscription. I was kicking myself for not looking earlier, but this actually helped me to not rush the decision.

The Solution

After spending another few weeks trying to live without Photoshop, I realized that I rely on it a little too much for certain plugins, like Canon’s Print Studio Pro for some of my printing workflow, and a few other things, so although I can use Affinity Photo for my editing work, I decided that it was probably better to keep Photoshop, so I went back to the Adobe website to check the prices of their subscription with just Photoshop.

I imagine there is some kind of a marketing campaign behind this, but I found that I could get the Photography Plan for just ¥12,700 for the year, which is about $121, just a hair over the cost of two months for the full Creative Cloud. This also comes with Lightroom which I do not need, but it was half the price of the other plans with just Photoshop in it, so I tried to see if I could switch, and I was able to do so without a penalty. In fact, after paying for a year of the Photography Plan, I received a refund of ¥613 or $5.83.

I was quite happy to be able to do this and would imagine that this would have been a cheaper option than paying the $333 to simply cancel my subscription. Conversely, I remained pretty annoyed that Adobe wanted to charge me this penalty after being a Master Suite user for well over ten years. I realize that they are running a business, and appreciate that a customer that is leaving is less important than one that is staying, albeit on a lower plan, but the whole thing just seemed cheap and completely disregarded the loyalty that I have shown to Adobe up to this point.

I’m also somewhat saddened to see Adobe making what I believe to be some strange marketing decisions. Whether you believe that they are gradually killing off the standalone version of Lightroom or not, their pricing strategies for the Creative Cloud seem to be annoying many more people than just me. Until a few years ago I would have banked on Adobe being around for at least a few more decades, but if they continue with their current strategies while their competitors continue to hit it out of the park, I’m no longer so sure of that.

Anyway, at this point, I’m happy that I do get to continue to use Photoshop as a plugin host, and I now have four of my five necessary programs covered for the price of just four monthly payments for the full Creative Cloud suite. I feel somewhat liberated, and I’m looking forward to not having to pay my monthly subscription to Adobe anymore. Whether I renew my subscription for the Photography Plan next year will depend on how much Adobe want for it, and also if the companies that create the plugins I use will release versions for other software like Affinity Photo. I actually doubt very much that this will happen, and imagine that Affinity will just gradually improve their support for Photoshop plugins instead. Either way, once that happens, I think I’ll stop my current Photography plan as well. I will also be careful to keep in mind that my subscription renews in June so that I don’t miss that again.

Of course, if you are using the Creative Cloud and still happy with it, I hope you continue to enjoy it. I have nothing against Adobe as such, but for me, I feel that it’s time to move on, and if you are feeling the same way, maybe the programs that I’ve decided on will help with your own search as well. Also, if you aren’t aware of which month your subscription renews in, it might be worth checking and making a note, so that it doesn’t creep up on you like it did me.

Mentorship Program Almost Ready!

Before we finish, I know that some of you are looking forward to the new MBP Mentorship program that I’ve been working on. Although I had to put this on the back-burner as I worked through a few personal issues this year, I’m now working on it again, and hope to start taking people on board over the next few weeks. The system will kick Mentees off with a short Getting Started course that helps to give me an idea of your level of understanding, while working towards you selecting a Primary Mentorship Path, which also includes one-to-one consultation sessions as the Mentee works through the various stages.

Mentorship System Screenshot

I’m building something that I think will be quite special and very helpful for anyone that wants to take your photography to the next level, so I’m really looking forward to opening this up for sign-ups over the next few weeks. If you are interested, please sign up for our newsletters, and I’ll be sure to mail out when the program goes live.

Show Notes

Get Affinity Software here:

Audacity is here:

Music by Martin Bailey


Subscribe in iTunes to get Podcasts delivered automatically to your computer.

Download this Podcast as an MP3 with Chapters.

Visit this page for help on how to view the images in MP3 files.

Share this post with your friends!

Here is the short-link:

You can also use the social icons below...

Martin Bailey
Martin Bailey is a nature and wildlife photographer and educator based in Tokyo. He's a pioneering Podcaster and blogger, and an X-Rite Coloratti member.
  • Roger Walton
    Posted at 23:07h, 14 August Reply

    I too was a long-term user of the full suite but the “crunch” for me was when Muse was effectively discontinued and all the Muse sites I’d made for people (including my own) became useless almost overnight. The result was Adobe lost a lot of money as I switched to the Photographer’s Plan only. I also now use Affinity Publisher and get a long with it well though I’m not as comfortable there as I was with InDesign. Audition was a loss but I can cope with Audacity instead. I wouldn’t want to desert Lightroom though as, in my mind, it is the best DAM solution out there.

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 09:45h, 15 August Reply

      Hi Roger,

      Ooh! That stings! I wasn’t aware that they did that, as I never used Muse, but just taking stuff away like that is hard to bear, especially when you were creating sites for others as well.

      That’s interesting that you were more comfortable in InDesign. I guess you must have been a lot more comfortable in InDesign than I ever got, despite the training I did. I just did not find it intuitive, yet Affinity Publisher has pretty much everything right where I’d expect it to be. Maybe it’s because I was born and raised a few miles from the Affinity Serif offices. 🙂

      I am really enjoying Audacity, although Audition is a better all-round solution. My problem is that it’s not really possible to apply lots of plugin effects in Audacity, so I’m having to round-trip out of Audicity to another application to use filters etc. to remove the sound of my air conditioning etc. Yesterday I actually found what I think it my best option yet, although it takes a bit longer to export the file. For my music production I use Ableton Live, and I created a template project with all of the filters that I need to run on the audio in an Effects Rack, so now I just have to drop the audio into one track, and the effects/filters are already in place. My intro and outro music are on a second track and I can easily drag them around to align the ending. Unfortunately, Ableton only outputs MP3 audio at 320 kbps, so I have to output a WAV and take that back into Audicity, then output my 190 kbps podcast file. It’s a few extra steps but I can live with that, and there is plenty to do while the export is running.

      I agree that Lightroom is the best DAM solution. I had to break my single Lightroom catalog into multiple catalogs when I moved to Capture One Pro.


      • Hans Knikman
        Posted at 14:08h, 15 August Reply

        Also dropped LR for CO a couple of years ago. DAM wise LR is top but CO has become better with the latest main releases. I have all images in one catalogue without any problems at this momen. Looking forward to a DAM solution of affinity though.

        • Martin Bailey
          Posted at 14:10h, 15 August Reply

          That’s interesting Hans. How many files are you managing in one catalog?

          It might be worth me trying again, although I do have my workflow working pretty well at the moment. Certainly worth revisitng though if Capture One Pro can now handle it.


          • Hans knikman
            Posted at 14:24h, 15 August Reply

            I have 180k+ files in one catalogue. Moving them from LR did take a lo of time, mainly because of the previews generation. But when that was finished it was ok

            • Martin Bailey
              Posted at 12:05h, 17 August Reply

              Thanks, Hans. It’s definitely improved then. When I tried to import my entire catalog, which was probably around 280k images at the time, it did not complete. I left it for many hours, and the process just kept crashing.

              I’m not sure that I need to go back to having everything in one catalog, but I’ll certainly try merging a few and see how Capture One Pro handles it now.

              Thanks for the pointer!


      • Daniel
        Posted at 03:17h, 16 August Reply

        Not a podcaster here but I have heard good things about REAPER (65€, trial available) with the Ultraschall plugin. (Free –

        UI is in English but all FAQ and tutorials are German only.

        Maybe not the best solution due to the missing englisch documentation and a steep learning curve but certainly worth a look. Auphonic support, StudioLink and Skype support, chapter marks, and many more things a podcaster needs are build in.

        • Martin Bailey
          Posted at 12:19h, 17 August Reply

          Hi Daniel,

          I have actually trialled REAPER as a DAW, because it apparently has really good MPE support. I found it difficult to work with, but I have to admit I did not give it much time.

          UltraSchall looks great though, so I’ll give both UltraSchall and REPEATER another try when I get some time. I’ve just downloaded them to my desktop as a reminder. Lack of English might be a problem if it’s really difficult to use, but hopefully I’ll be able to figure it out.

          Oh, BTW, I don’t qualify for the 65 Euro license for REPEAPER, so I’ll have to spring the 225 if I decide to go this route. 🙂

          Thanks for the pointer Daniel!


  • Hans Knikman
    Posted at 01:05h, 15 August Reply

    Way cheaper than final cut and more powerful is davinci resolve. There also is a free version available. All a filmmaker can wish. You might want have a look at it!

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 09:58h, 15 August Reply

      Hi Hans,

      Thanks for pointing out DaVinci Resolve! I just took a look and downloaded the free version. I’m not sure I need any of the paid version features, so this may be fine. I see that the paid version is $299, the same price as Final Cut Pro, so if I do need to upgrade, it will be difficult to decide which way to go, as working with industry standards is often better for sharing projects etc. Most people I’ve worked with on video projects are either Premiere Pro or Final Cut Pro X.

      Having said that, I do like the look of DaVince Resolve, and I don’t collaborate that often, so you never know. Thanks again!


      • Hans knikman
        Posted at 13:58h, 15 August Reply

        Hi Martin, as a professional documentary maker I worked with avid media composer, the standard in the film industry and television world but changed to DaVinci. All software and a modern interface, way cheaper and most important… it has it all in one package. The free version probably is all you need. I can do 99% of the work in it. ( no ties with the firm here 😊) good luck!

        • Martin Bailey
          Posted at 14:05h, 15 August Reply

          Hi Hans,

          A recommendation from someone with your background is certainly worth a lot. The features in the paid version don’t seem necessary to me at this point, so I agree that the free version will probably be enough.

          To be honest, I don’t really like free. I’d prefer it if there was a basic version for say $100 and the full version for $299. I always feel as though I’m taking advantage of a company by using free products. But, if that’s their business model, I’ll certainly give DaVinci a good run for its, erm, money. :/

          Thanks again for your recommendation. I’d literally never heard of DaVinci, but I’m looking forward to checking it out now.


          • Hans knikman
            Posted at 14:18h, 15 August Reply

            DaVinci is a big name in the film industry for professionalcolor correction for years. They started in the editing business by building the app from scratch like Serif with affinity (which Apps I am using too, except for printing with the canon tool). It is free because of that while wiggling their way into a already saturated small professional market

  • Tim L
    Posted at 06:10h, 15 August Reply

    I’m not sure what you mean by “stand alone Lightroom”. Perhaps you are referring to the Classic version. If you’re referring to the perpetual license version, Adobe eliminated that option quite a while ago (October 2017, IIRC) when they introduced what would have been version Lr 7.

    Unlike you, I have always viewed Adobe’s transition to their rental scheme as a move that primarily benefitted Adobe’s shareholders to the detriment of most customers (and I would argue that history has largely borne that out) but it is actually Apple that will keep me paying monthly rental fees to Adobe. The power of the latest iPad Pros, combined with Apple’s decision to open up iOS 13 to external drives and even mouse support, make the iPad Pro ideal for travel. Affinity Photo on iPad is a great alternative to Photoshop on iPad (assuming it becomes reality at some point) but I’m unaware of any alternative to Lr on mobile. I don’t see C1 being interested in competing in the mobile space.

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 10:05h, 15 August Reply

      Hi Tim,

      Yes, by standalone I meant non-cloud, as in Classic. I just have a hard time with the word Classic with regards to a piece of software that I used to love.

      I would love to be able to travel with just an iPad Pro and would trade-in my current one for the latest model if only Capture One Pro was also available for iOS, but I agree, the chances of that happening are probably very slim, so I think I’m stuck with my MacBook Pro for travel. I actually always take the iPad Pro as well, but a reduction in baggage weight is always welcome.


  • Ian M Butterfield
    Posted at 00:31h, 16 August Reply

    Hi Martin,
    Just listened to this podcast and your comments echo almost exactly my own thoughts. Affinity Publisher was the game changer for me – once that was available and I used it during the Beta phase I knew it was way better than InDesign and that meant I was almost at the point of ditching Adobe CC. Video is important to me and that was a sticking point – I am a Windows user FCP was not an option. I thin stumbled on DaVinci resolve and after a quick tryout, I was more than happy to pay $299 for it…. EXCEPT… that I still haven’t found anything that I can’t do in the free version! And that includes greenscreen Multicam and ‘after-effects style’ titles. As soon as I do find something I need the paid-for version I am happy to pay.

    LR/PS, however, I’m the opposite way round to you – I can quite happily dump PS for Affinity Photo, but I have so many plugins that I use in LR that I can’t easily drop LR. Many of them I can work around – but I use custom metadata extensively and no other Workflow/DAM tool will allow me to define my own metadata fields. But as soon as Capture One or On1 will let me… then it is bye-bye LR. Like you, I feel like’Classic’ is being sidelined.

    Thanks for the podcast – it is reassuring to hear another photographer putting into words what I have been feeling for some time.
    PS. Do give DaVinci Resolve some serious consideratoin for your video work – I’m reading about more and more video pros switching to it from Premiere.

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 21:36h, 17 August Reply

      Hi Ian,

      It’s great to hear that we have followed pretty much the same paths. I’ve been watching the Affinity suite with interest, but with the first half of my year being like a whirlwind, I didn’t notice the beta of Publisher. It was the release announcement that caught my eye, and I’m glad it did!

      I will certainly give DaVinci Resolve a try. I was thinking of Final Cut Pro because I didn’t have an alternative, but now that you and Hans have told me about DaVinci, I’m pretty much sold. Thanks!


    • Brian Witter
      Posted at 05:04h, 23 August Reply

      Look into IMatch. It is very powerful, the community forums are helpful, and the developer is very responsive. I just asked a few days ago why my .exr files weren’t showing thumbnails, and yesterday a new build was released that solved it. It follows metadata standards and doesn’t lock you in, For custom metadata, look into categories and/or attributes. LR as a DAM was no longer working for me, it wasn’t finding files even though the metadata was there. It is also very limited in what it will track. Capture One Pro is so much better at processing for me I can overlook the weak DAM, I just set it to read xmp so I can search the metadata that I create with IMatch.

      • Ian M Butterfield
        Posted at 05:31h, 23 August Reply

        Hi Brian,
        I’m familiar with IMatch – I was user for many years. I agree it is a good product but I have some reservations. It is owned and developed by just one person which is a big concern for me. I’ve used software before that has a single developer product which has left me high and dry when they lost interest or were unable to continue developing the product.

        Something like that *almost* happened with IMatch when I was using it, Marcus(?) was developing IMatch NG (Next Generation) but it took about three years it began to look as though it was never going to arrive. The old version of IMatch that we were using wasn’t coping or keeping up with what I and many others needed. Eventual the new version did arrive but not until many of us had jumped ship and were working with a new all singing all dancing piece of software called “Lightroom” (yes that’s how long ago this was!).

        IMatch has come a long way since then and I’ve not ruled out a return. Even though I know it is possible to extract the data from it, I am still fearful of single owner products.

        • Brian Witter
          Posted at 10:00h, 23 August Reply

          I hear you, I had the same concerns until I thought about the all the times Autodesk, Adobe, Google, Microsoft, Apple …. abandoned programs. Autodesk did it three times with programs that did the same thing (Effect/Paint, Combustion, and Toxic) How often are those big companies going to have a fix in days that only one guy was asking for? Mario is a smart guy, so I’m sure he knows I’m not really the only one who will appreciate it, but still. There just isn’t a safety net other than can you easily get out all the data you put in. I don’t think there is a more powerful DAM at the consumer level I think it will be a while before Phase One puts any real effort into DAM, the old users just don’t seem to care. I don’t see much effort from On1 on the DAM front either I had their plus plan from the beginning until last Dec. I can’t say if IMatch is the best choice for you. I had the same concerns I’ve seen you and others bring up while looking to leave LR, in the year and half since I switched I have no regrets.

  • Mark Casebeer
    Posted at 23:47h, 19 August Reply

    I totally agree with your post about Adobe products. To be honest I really don’t think they care about the individual (professional or amateur). They are all about the corporate world.

    If you’re are Lightroom/Photoshop user like me then the photographers’ plan makes sense. Anything else is just stupidly expensive.

    I’ve migrated to Affinity Designer and Publisher. Love paying upfront for a program, I get to choose if a major update is worth the price. I also use Affinity Photo that really integrates with Publisher very well. (for me it’s no Photoshop). I find both these programs far easier to learn and use than any of the Adobe products. I’m able to do things in Designer than I could never master in Illustrator.

    I ditched Dreamweaver and have used Blocs for my website work. Again far more easy than Adobe.

    I do disagree that Adobe will price themselves out of the market, just look at 2018 earning,
    “Adobe achieved record revenue of greater than $9 billion and delivered outstanding earnings performance in fiscal 2018,” said Shantanu Narayen, president and CEO, Adobe. “In 2018 we made significant investments across our product portfolio, entered new markets, and made strategic acquisitions which we believe will fuel continued top and bottom-line performance.”

    It’s nice that we now have choices that don’t break the bank. Great post, enjoyed reading it. Thanks for changing some of the viewers’ settings, it’s a better user experience.


    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 09:58h, 20 August Reply

      Hi Mark,

      I would think that Adobe doesn’t care as much about the individual as we’d like to think, but non-corporate sales have to still be a large enough slice of their bottom line that we’re still important to them. It would be good to see the proportions of corporate vs non-corporate sales. There are a few hints in this document, but the “feeling” I get is closer in line with your view than mine. 🙂

      I didn’t really mean that Adobe would price themselves out of the Market. I’m thinking more about product and marketing strategies that “may” harm them as a company, similar to, for example, Apple making the decision to kill off Aperture. It’s very similar to Adobe making Lightroom “Classic”, which to me means it’s on its way out. I know people are arguing against this theory, and I hope they are right, but naming something Classic is not a good sign, in my opinion.

      Of course, Apple probably don’t miss Aperture, and these (both Adobe and Apple) are folks that know what they are doing, so I was just speculating, but my point was, I was always confident that Adobe would be around, like, forever. But now I’m not so sure. The other major part of this, of course, is companies like Serif that make the Affinity products. If they can continue to make products that we both agree are in many ways head and shoulders over their comparative Adobe Products, and with a more palatable licensing model, it’s eventually going to take its toll on Adobe, so their future may not be as safe as I’d have imagined a few years ago, although I do agree, that it probably won’t kill them off completely. 🙂

      Thanks for the great and thought-provoking comment Mark. It’s always good to discuss these topics.


  • Mark Hopgood
    Posted at 21:23h, 21 August Reply

    I enjoyed this podcast Martin and fully agree. I never transitioned to the subscription model especially as the exchange rate in Australia is not very favourable.
    I still have PS CS6 but don’t use it often. I use C1 and Affinity Photo. The plugin compatibility is a bit of an issue and I have had to find work arounds as I used TK Action Panel for luminosity masking. I now have some macros that do a basic job in this regard. I also use DaVinci Resolve and the other Affinity products.

    I have a 2010 Mac Pro so I tend to have smaller catalogues which can be a bit of a pain. Perhaps when I finally update my computer I can combine a few. On that subject I use Photo Mechanic to ingest my images. This is mainly to do with the speed and that I can ingest two cards at once plus have them backed up to another drive. Keywords on import is important as well. The workflow for rating and culling images could not be faster. Once I have gone through this process I import the remaining images into a C1 catalogue. The ratings, colour codes and keywords are also transferred across. I know they are working on a DAM as a paid upgrade to PM6. I would say it would be able to handle a very large catalogue given their history. How you could integrate that with a separate C1 catalogue is an unknown. I’m thinking the PM DAM to find an image which will then point you to the various C1 catalogues. Just a thought.

    I enjoy your work.

    Cheers Mark

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 00:19h, 29 August Reply

      Hi Mark,

      Thanks for the kind words!

      Have you tried the new Luminosity Mask feature built into Capture One Pro 12? That was what it took to get me into doing any kind of luminosity masking, and may well be an alternative to your TK Action Panel, and macros.

      I used Davinci Resolve for the first time briefly last week, to create the video that I embedded into the post after this one. I like it a lot, so I’m pleased everyone let me know about it.

      On my machines, Capture One Pro can do everything that you mentioned you do with Photo Mechanic except keywords on import. I used to do that with Lightroom, so I do miss that, but because I’m doing fine with Capture One as a DAM and I am really happy with the speed of the rating process in Capture One Pro, I have just gotten used to doing my keywording after import. Personally, for me, it would take more than the keywording to make me add a second application to my workflow.

      It will be interesting to see how your workflow shapes up though, with the upcoming PM DAM and Capture One catalog integration. Keep me in the loop if you come up with anything that works well.


      • Mark Hopgood
        Posted at 14:40h, 29 August Reply

        Hi Martin

        Yes I have and it was the main feature why I upgraded C1. It is mainly for any compositing work or artistic interpretations that I use Affinity Photo and therefore would like to have Luminosity masks. Having said that their blend options feature is quite good. I just have to get better at using it.

        Another point that I had intended to mention but forgot was C1’s new plugin feature. I imagine that you are not the only photographer to use Canon’s Print Studio Pro. Perhaps a request to either may see it as a plugin for C1. That way you would be free from Adobe.

        • Martin Bailey
          Posted at 18:13h, 29 August Reply

          Hi Mark,

          OK, I see. If you’re compositing, it’s definitely out of Capture One Pro territory.

          It would certainly be nice to see Canon’s Print Studio Pro as a Capture One plugin. The developer at Canon that did the Mac version of the Accounting Manager application that comes with large format printers told me that he did it just because I asked for it, so maybe I’ll try my luck again. 🙂

          Thanks for mentioning it. I probably woudn’t have thought of that otherwise. Fingers crossed!


  • Ulysses Ashton
    Posted at 21:19h, 28 August Reply

    Thank you for this, Martin. I actually read the article from top to bottom rather than listen to the podcast. I seemed to have had a Safari browser issue with loading the podcast at the top of the page. By the time I’d gotten midway through the article, the podcast was loaded; however, I was already invested in the written words. 🙂

    As the comments prove, your tale resonates with quite a number of us. I was one of the first generation to voice dissatisfaction with Adobe when in May 2013 they announced their software rental scheme via their Creative Cloud products. It was never about the money. Many of us were quite vocal about the fact that Adobe no longer offered options for a perpetual license of their software. When it was clear that they were not listening to their users — at least not the niche of small-business customers — I knew the writing was on the wall. I was going to need to find other software to replace my Adobe options.

    At that point I began taking a much closer look at the software I used in my workflow. I was stunned to realize just how mired in an Adobe workflow our studio had become. More specifically, I relied upon a system of plug-ins that required Adobe products. Over the years, I’d paid a ton of money to the larger corporation as well as to smaller satellite companies in the Adobe ecosphere. And yet there was neither any respect for customer feedback nor loyalty to the customer.

    So I set about on a long-term plan to investigate other options — specifically for Photoshop and Lightroom since those were my workhorse applications. Because I’m rather methodical about this sort of thing, and there was a lack of free time, I’d previously been using Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 5, but was gradually running into issues with their lack of support for newer camera raw formats. Purchasing Lightroom 6, the final version with a perpetual license, softened the urgency of leaving Adobe while I took my time to research and test other options.

    This is when I found Affinity Photo, perhaps four of five years ago. I knew fairly instantly that it was a powerful piece of software. Transition from a Photoshop workflow was relatively easy because there was a fair amount of parity between their respective interfaces and even their keyboard shortcuts. Over time, I found that some operations were actually easier, quicker, and more intuitive than within Photoshop (for example, the Frequency Separation tool). I transitioned from testing Affinity Photo to making it a permanent part of my workflow. It got to the point that I actually began to forget how to do certain things in Photoshop, wondering why certain tools were “missing!”

    Lightroom was easily supplanted by Capture One Pro. Although I was familiar with COP for years and even owned it, I never invested the time to learn it. Its interface seemed intimidating and difficult, not very user friendly. However, Capture One Pro version 10 changed all of that, with a number of improvements that made COP much more approachable. I was highly motivated to look into their very deep knowledge base and tutorials, and was finally able to overcome the fear factor of moving away from Lightroom. I’m a much happier photographer for the effort.

    As for my former set of many plug-ins for Photoshop and Lightroom, some of the more important ones work along with Affinity Photo. And the ones that don’t work at all, I find I don’t actually miss them that much. What I’ve gained in enjoying my work and in $$$ savings offsets saying goodbye to those plug-ins.

    Additionally, Serif listens to customer feedback. Some of my own suggestions have been implemented as additional features and fixes in their desktop and mobile products. This is thrilling!

    Ultimately, I feel more in control of my own decisions, rather than those decisions being controlled by a large corporation that has zero interest in my studio. So go ahead and make a clean break, Martin (and others sitting on the Adobe fence!) In my case, it wasn’t good enough to simply reduce the amount of money I was paying to Adobe. I was motivated enough to make a clean break from their photography and design products. Any upset to my studio workflow has been temporary.

    • Martin Bailey
      Posted at 00:43h, 29 August Reply

      Hi Ulysses,

      Sorry to hear that you had problems with the audio player. Occasionally it can take a while to display, due to the cache software settings, but usually, if it’s not there pretty quickly, try refreshing the page. I’ve actually not noticed it getting stuck for a while, and thought I had the settings down, so maybe you could try flushing your browser cache. You may have some old code that is getting in the way.

      You have a great story of your transition, which I enjoyed reading. It is actually cheaper for me to keep Photoshop for this year, as it was going to cost me $333 to cancel my Creative Cloud subscription, and it only cost me $121 to switch to the Photoshop subscription, so I’m ahead of the game now.

      I have relayed the main plugins that I would love for Affinity Photo to support to the Serif team. If they support my requested plugins before next June, I will be able to cut the cord on the Creative Cloud completely. Right now, Photoshop is still required as a plugin host, unfortunately.

      I was actually never against the Creative Cloud, as it worked out cheaper for me than buying the Master Suite upgrades, at least until they started to creep the price up. It was these stealth price increases that really got me thinking. I had already moved to Capture One Pro in 2016, to version 9, so Lightroom was no longer part of the equation for me.

      I was also reliant on Adobe for too many other products until Serif covered Illustrator and InDesign as well as Photoshop. I’m looking forward to seeing what they come up with next, but now that everyone has told me about Davinci Resolve for video, I’m not so desperate for Serif to release an alternative, although I’ll certainly take a look if they do, as they have done everything else they do so well!

      Anyway, it was great to see your story and compare notes. Thanks again for taking the time to share it here.


  • Hans
    Posted at 15:19h, 29 August Reply

    I also did a plugin request at PhaseOne for a printing path from CO to Canon Print Studio Pro. Guess how more users do this the better 🙂

Post A Comment

Meet Your New Photographer's Friend

Take control of your photography with our insanely detailed Depth of Field Calculator. Master exposure with the Neutral Density Filter Calculator and Exposure Shift Calculator. Three great tools in one app, with Apple Watch Extensions (available as in-app purchase) and a wealth of inspiring tools and information!