telephoto lens | Martin Bailey Photography

Shooting and Focusing Techniques for Telephoto Lenses (Podcast 584)

by Martin Bailey | Aug 8, 2017 | Fundamentals, Podcast, Tutorial

Last week a friend and fellow traveler on my workshops Ulana Switucha asked me a question about good techniques for using long telephoto lenses to photograph moving subjects. Although I have talked about much of what I will cover in other posts over the years, today we’re going to bring all of this into one post, and I’ll update you with my latest settings etc.

[smart_track_player url=”https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/mbppodcast/mbpp_ep584″ src=”https://app.fusebox.fm/embed/player.js” class=”mbp-ignore”>

Using a long telephoto lens, such as my 100-400mm Mark II lens, or even longer telephoto zoom and prime lenses, adds a few new concepts that we are required to keep in mind in order to use them successfully. These can be split broadly into two areas, the need to avoid camera movement during the exposure and the need to focus and track a moving subject.

Camera Movement

One of the things that people tend to overlook when initially starting to use a long telephoto lens, or even the long end of a zoom lens such as my 24-105mm, is that as you zoom in and frame a subject with a narrower field of view, you increase the risk of moving the camera and lens during the exposure.

Although shorter lenses are generally lighter, it isn’t just that long lenses can be heavier and more difficult to hand-hold that causes this problem. To cause an image to appear blurred, we basically have to move the camera far enough for the details in the scene to move into the adjacent pixel on our sensor. With a telephoto lens, the field of view is much narrower, so even the same amount of movement from our hands effectively moves the image more than when using a wide angle lens. Just as the images we create with telephoto lenses are magnified, our movement is also amplified.

This is also why you’ll hear people complaining about the sharpness of telephoto lenses more than wide angle lenses. Although wide zoom range lenses can have lower image quality, it’s sometimes just a case of it being much easier to snaffle your shot with a long lens, and people often just don’t get that.

Shutter Speed as Focal Length Rule of Thumb

If you consider that the problem is details captured moving over to the adjacent pixels during the exposure, one way to overcome this is to make the exposure faster. If the exposure finishes before the details we are photographing move to the next pixel or further, the image will be sharp. There is a simple rule of thumb to use that helps to avoid this problem.

Basically, you use the focal length that you’ll shoot at as the denominator in the shutter speed fraction. So, if you are shooting at 400mm, without considering any other factors such as subject movement, you will need a shutter speed of 1/400 of a second to avoid camera shake. If you are shooting at 100mm a shutter speed of 1/100 or faster is advisable.

This is also the case for wider focal lengths, such as 24mm. It depends on how steady your posture and hand-holding techniques are, but with good technique, you could probably hand-hold at 24mm with a shutter speed of 1/25 of a second.

Compensating for Subject Movement

Of course, it’s possible if not likely that if there is anything moving in your scene, as you slow down your shutter speed, it will probably move during the exposure. Just like camera movement, if any part of the scene moves far enough to traverse multiple pixels in your photograph, it will start to appear blurry. The more pixels traversed, the more blurry that subject will become.

So, unless our intention is to use the subject movement artistically, we need to compensate for subject movement, by increasing our shutter speed, and how much depending on how fast and the direction in which the subject is moving, and also to a degree, how close they are to the camera.

If I am photographing a street with people walking around, I’d probably try to get at least a 1/125 of a second shutter speed if I wanted to freeze that motion. For someone running, I’d use at least 1/500 of a second, or faster if I need a really sharp photo. For a bird in flight, I try to get at least 1/800 of a second, though generally, I’m looking at between 1/1000 and 1/2000 of a second.

These are just general guidelines of course. I’ve photographed birds in flight much slower, and if you are photographing a humming bird, even an 1/8000 of a second shutter speed may not freeze the movement of its wings. Also, a subject moving towards you won’t require as fast a shutter speed as one moving across the frame.

Limitations of Image Stabilization

Let’s keep in mind too that although a very useful feature, Image Stabilization or Vibration Reduction in our lenses is only effective for slow moving or stationary subjects. For a moving subject, we still need to use these shutter speed guidelines to freeze that movement of the subject, if indeed that is our goal.

IS Modes

I didn’t mention this in the audio, because I forgot, but I would like to just add that I generally use Image Stabilization Mode 2 when photographing birds in flight, when I might be panning around with them. For station subjects, I use Mode 1, and I’m not a huge fan of the new Mode 3.

The Trade-Off

I say that I “try” to get these shutter speeds because there is often a trade-off. As we’ll talk about shortly, for larger birds, or multiple subjects that require a deeper depth of field, we often have to use a small aperture, and as we make the aperture smaller, less light enters the camera, so we need to use higher ISO settings and/or longer shutter speeds to maintain a good exposure.

On an overcast day for example, if necessary, you can get away with slower shutter speeds for large birds like swans and cranes, and large eagles in flight. For this photograph (below) of two Whooper Swans at dawn, when it was overcast and still pretty dark, I had to increase my ISO to 2500 to get a shutter speed of 1/500 of a second at f/10.

Whooper Swans in Flight at Lake Kussharo

My focal length was only 114mm, so f/10 was enough to get both birds sharp in the instance, and because they are large birds 1/500 of a second will get me sharp wings until they are really flapping quickly. It will leave sometimes leave movement in the wing tips during a flap, but I’m fine with that.

Compressed Depth of Field

So, I’ve mentioned the depth of field in our images, and this is something that we must keep in mind, especially when working at longer focal lengths because the depth of field in our images gets shallower as we increase the focal length. I often photograph wildlife at between f/8 and f/14, because even at these smaller apertures, I often still only have a very shallow depth of field in which to place my subject, and the background will often still be nice and blurred, how I like it.

Here (below) is a diagram that I created for my Sharp Shooter ebook from Craft & Vision, which shows the relationship between focal length and depth of field. At 24mm, a very wide focal length, with your aperture set to f/16 if you focus on something at 1.2 meters or 4 feet, the depth of field starts at 0.6 meters or 2 feet and stretches to infinity, so everything from 2 feet is in focus. At 50 mm, a slightly longer focal length, if you focus at 5 meters or 17 feet, everything from 2.6 meters or 8.6 feet to infinity will be in focus.

But, when you use a longer focal length, such as 200mm you have to focus right out at 83 meters or 274 feet before you can achieve pan-focus, where everything from 42 meters or 137 feet would be in focus. If we expand this explanation to talk about longer focal lengths, such as 400mm for example, to achieve pan-focus, you would need to be focusing the lens at 345 meters or 1,130 feet and this really is too far to get an impactful photograph of your subject, so using pan-focus or hyperfocal distance won’t really come into play with long telephotos lenses.

Of course, another aspect of depth of field, is that the closer you focus, the shallower the depth of field gets, but we won’t go into any more details on this today. I have an old post Depth of Field Explained from some nine years ago that goes into this in more detail, so please check that out if you are interseted.

Also, let’s keep in mind that depth of field calculations are based on what’s considered acceptable sharpness in an 8 x 10-inch print. If you need to print larger or require everything to be tack sharp, you won’t see that for everything inside this theoretical depth of field. We’ll talk more about critical focus in a moment.

Focusing with Telephoto Lenses

Let’s move on now and talk about focusing techniques for moving subjects, such as wildlife or sports. I’m a wildlife shooter rather than a sports shooter, but what we’ll cover will be equally useful for both.

Critical Focus

Although we have a larger area of depth of field in our images as we mentioned earlier, that entire area is not totally sharp. It’s what’s considered to be in “acceptible focus”. There is an area within the depth of field that is totally sharp, and this is called the area of “critical focus”. To nail critical focus, we need to focus on the subject of most interest, and when the subject is moving around, there are a number of techniques that we need to use to nail that critical focus, and we’ll cover that now.

Framing Your Subject

First of all, it can take a while to even get used to finding the subject in the viewfinder when you first lift your camera to your eye. With a telephoto zoom lens, you can try zooming out initially, and then once you have your subject in the viewfinder, zoom in while keeping the subject framed.

That takes time though, and if you are using a telephoto prime lens, it isn’t even possible, so you need to develop the ability to raise the camera to your eye and quickly find and frame the subject as the action unfolds. This is one of those things that really just comes with practice.

I think subconsciously I am aligning the lens with my subject as I either raise the camera, or I move my eye towards the viewfinder if using a camera support, so by the time I start to look through the viewfinder the subject isn’t hard to locate. I haven’t used a telephoto prime for a number of years now, but I do recall a few times when I had to move my eye away from the viewfinder and relocate a bird in flight, then try again to find it, when I used to shoot with a 600mm prime lens, but it did get easier with practice.

Now, I’m either using my 100-400mm or the 200-400mm with the built-in 1.4X Extender, and both give me the ability to zoom out a little if I need to locate my subject in the sky or scene.

Tracking Your Subject

One of the most challenging aspects of using a long telephoto lens to photograph a moving subject is accurately tracking the subject to enable you to photograph it. To do this, we need to use a continuous focus mode, such as AI Servo on a Canon camera, or Continuous Servo on a Nikon camera. These modes will enable you to continue to focus on your subject while you keep your auto-focus engaged.

Tracking Parameters

How well your camera does at actually sticking with your intended subjects depends on your tracking settings for any given situation. A tip here, especially for Canon users, is to add the main focus settings to your My Menu screen, as you can see in this photo (below).

As you can see, I’ve added Tracking sensitivity, Acceleration/deceleration tracking and AF point auto switching to My Menu. This gives me the ability to quickly tweak these settings if I need to, but to be totally honest, I haven’t changed these settings since I reached what I believe to be the optimal settings for the subjects I shoot with my Canon EOS 5Ds R camera.

I should mention that my starting point in the Canon AF settings screens was Case 2, as this is the closest to what I wanted to achieve. The explanation text says “Continue to track subjects, ignoring possible obstacles”. If you press the Info button on the back of the camera while on the AF settings screen, you can see the text “Even if the subjects briefly move from the AF point, they will remain in focus. Effective when obstacles briefly come between the camera and subject, or with erratically moving subjects that are harder to track. Set [Tracking sensitivty] to -2 for even better tracking of subjects that may move from the selected AF point.” As you can see from the image (above) I did indeed move Tracking sensitivity to -2.

The Info button for Accel./decel. tracking states that you should increase this for better tracking of subjects that erratically accelerate or stop. I found that for eagles swooping down to catch fish, or for snow monkeys that move quite erratically as they run down a snow covered hill, having this set to +1 works very well. In fact, although it was tweaking these settings while photographing the snow monkeys that brought me to these settings, as I mentioned a moment ago, I pretty much leave these settings as they are for all of my wildlife work.

The AF point auto switching setting works best for me at zero. This setting only comes into effect when using all 61 AF points, which we’ll look at shortly, but I found that anything over zero for this setting makes the camera move to other obstacles or areas of strong contrast very easily.

One example is when photographing the sea eagles in Hokkaido over the water, as in this photo (below). Water catches the light, especially on sunny days, and will often steal the focus from the eagle (or any other subject on or over water) very easily. With my current settings, that probably happens less than 3% of the time now, although it used to be a big problem for me before these features were added to our cameras, and I found my optimal settings from amongst these options.

Another instance when these settings that I’ve shared helps is when for example, I’m focussing on a bird coming in to land or flying amongst other birds. With the auto switching too sensitive, the moment another bird enters the frame and goes over an AF point, the focus will switch to the closer bird. With the sensitivity dialed down a little, as long as I stay with my original subject, other obstacles can move right across the frame over the other AF points, and the camera will usually not jump on to it while I continue to focus.

Back Button Focus

There are still times of course when the autofocus doesn’t work perfectly, though these times get fewer and farther between with each generation of camera. When it does happen, the best thing to do is to stop focussing momentarily, then try to regain focus. If the subject is moving relatively parallel to you, as in they aren’t getting any closer or further away, another option is to simply stop focussing, but you need to remove the focus mechanism from the shutter button to do that.

Because of this, I always change my cameras so that the shutter button only engages metering. As you can see from this photo of my Custom Controls menu, shutter button half-press only engages Metering start, and not autofocus as well, which is the default setting.

Once your shutter button no longer engages your autofocus, you need to press the AF-ON button on the top right of the back of the camera to engage autofocus. This takes some getting used to, and people often forget to focus occasionally after starting to use this “back button focus” technique, but generally, this is a better way to focus for wildlife and sports photographers, because it gives the following benefits.

Release the Shutter Without Refocusing

The main benefit is that you can release the shutter without forcing the camera to try to autofocus. This might seem unnecessary until you try it, but sometimes the fact that the shutter button engages the autofocus really gets in the way. For example, if you are photographing a subject that is in a heavily textured environment or with other things moving around in the foreground, being able to snap the focus on to the main subject quickly, then release your thumb from the AF-ON button, enables us to get our shot without the camera losing focus as it tries to lock on to something else.

One Shot/AI Servo Toggle

There are also times, say when photographing a bird in flight, when you don’t necessarily want the bird to be in the middle of the frame where the AF points are. At times like this, we can frame the subject with the focus points over the subject for a moment, press the back AF-ON button to gain focus, and then release the AF-ON button again. This makes the back AF-ON button act almost like the One Shot or Single Shot focusing mode, and then enables us to reframe the subject away from the AF points to release the shutter and get our photographs.

Of course, if the subject is moving towards us or further away, they might go out of our area of critical sharpness, so you have to be careful or very quick, but having this ability without actually switching to One Shot mode is invaluable and has enabled me to get many shots that would not have been possible otherwise.

Instant Manual Focus

Even for landscape photography, I use this method of focusing and it means that I can automatically switch to Manual focus without actually flicking the AF button on my lens to MF, simply by not pressing the AF-ON button on the back of the camera.

That means I can focus on what I want to focus on in a scene, and then frame up my shot, and because the shutter button doesn’t make the camera autofocus again, I don’t have to worry about where the focus points are, because the lens won’t try to refocus when I press the shutter button to start my exposure. If your shutter button engages autofocus, as soon as you press the shutter button to make your exposure, the lens will start to focus again, and depending on what focus point you have selected, it may well focus on the wrong part of the scene.

Selected Focus Point

Another important setting when photographing subjects that are moving around is setting up your camera to use multiple AF points in a specific way. Some photographers will recommend moving the focus point or a cluster of focus points around the viewfinder, but in my experience, that method is too clumsy and results in you losing shots as you try to align your focus points with your subject. At the very least, it results in you having your subject in the same part of the frame for too many shots, and I don’t like that.

Using All 61 AF Points on the Canon 5Ds R

To give you the greatest compositional freedom, I recommend turning on all focus points and then set up your camera to gain initial focus with a selected focus point or the center focus point, but then continue to track the subject with all focus points.

To turn on all focus points on my Canon 5Ds R, after switching to AI Servo mode, I press the AF point selection button (step 1 in the above photograph) which is the button in the top right-hand corner on the back of the camera, then while looking through the viewfinder or the top LCD display, I press the M-fn button next to the Main Dial behind the shutter button (step 2 above) to toggle through the AF modes and switch from the modes represented by SEL [ ] to the [ ] AF mode (step 3 above) which is 61-point automatic selection AF.

Another important setting here is in the AF4 Autofocus settings screen on the 5Ds R, for the “Initial AF Pt, AI Servo AF” where I chose “Initial AF pt selected”. This tells the camera to gain initial focus with the AF point that I have selected, but then as the subject moves, or I recompose, the camera will track the subject around the frame with the rest of the AF points.

If you get the settings right, you should see the AF points look like the bottom of these two diagrams (right) with all of the AF points represented, and the center one selected. If you see an empty AF frame like the top diagram, check your settings, and refer to your manual if necessary.

What to Focus On?

The settings we’ve walked through just now work very well for me, but we still need to decide what to focus on as we shoot, so here are a few pointers.

Get Eyes Sharp

When photographing a subject with eyes, in general, the eyes will need to be sharp. If you are close enough to focus directly on the eyes, do so. When you are a bit further away, get into the habit of focusing on the head when possible. If the animal is so far away or moving too fast or erratically that you can’t focus on the head, then focus on the base of the neck or body. When photographing a bird in flight from the side, the body will often be about the same distance from the camera as the head, so focussing on the body will be fine then too.

For photographs like this one (below) of an eagle catching a fish, I will wait until the eagle swoops down and then try to lock focus on the body. Note how the wings have completely covered the body at the time of this frame, but the settings I’ve selected prevent the camera from moving focus to the wings as they move.

Multiple Subjects

When focussing on two birds in flight, you’d generally try to get the bird that is closer to the camera critically focussed, and then try to use a small enough aperture to get the second bird in focus as well, as I did in my earlier Whooper Swan example. If however, the second bird is slightly out of focus, it might not be too much of an issue if the closer bird is sharp.

There are always exceptions to any guideline though, so if for example, the bird that is further away is doing something of interest, then try to focus on that instead. In a sports photograph with a field full of soccer players, for example, you’ll generally want the critical focus to be on the player that is creating the action, such as kicking the ball or saving a goal, rather than the other players.

Focus on Texture

Another important factor in focusing that sometimes isn’t obvious is that as good as the autofocus systems on our cameras are getting, they still require a bit of texture to achieve focus. If you are focusing on a subject with very little texture, the autofocus will often start searching, and you may find that you have to move the camera until the focus point or points are over the edge of the subject or some area with more texture. The autofocus systems available today still need something to get their teeth into.

A Gimbal Head Supertelephoto Lenses

I love the flexibility of the 100-400mm lens, as I can hand-hold this lens successfully, which gives me more flexibility for fast past wildlife shooting. When using longer, heavier super-telephoto lenses though, such as my 200-400mm lens with the built-in 1.4X Extender, or any of the super-telephoto prime lenses available, you really need to use a gimbal style tripod head. A gimbal gives you the ability to move the camera around effortlessly and smoothly because the weight is perfectly balanced.

In this photo (below) you can see the Really Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head. This is what I’ve been using for the last three or four years, and I absolutely love it! The resistance provided as you pan around is just right for smooth tracking and panning with your subjects. Also, it breaks down into smaller components so it packs really well for traveling.

Here also is a photo of my Really Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal with my Canon 200-400mm lens mounted on it. The important thing to note when using a Gimbal Head like this is that you need to adjust the position of the components of the head so that the lens is perfectly balanced. When you tilt the lens down or up then let go of it, it should stay where it is. If it flops up or down, it isn’t balanced.

Canon 200-400mm 1.4X Ext with RRS PG-02 Pano-Gimbal

Note that I usually set my camera up on a Gimbal with the gimbal arm on the right side of the camera. This enables me to reach out and manually adjust focus or adjust the settings of the lens without the gimbal arm getting in the way.

One other bit of advice is to try to avoid using a gimbal head for lenses like the 100-400mm lens, as you will generally get better results with the smaller lenses like this by shooting handheld. Of course, if you find the 100-400mm to heavy to handhold for long periods of time, a gimbal will help, but you will lose some freedom to move around etc.

Monopods

I shouldn’t really close today without mentioning monopods. I do own a monopod, but to be totally honest, I rarely use it. I’m not going to say that they are not worth using, but for the kind of work I do, they don’t seem to help. I prefer to either hand-hold, or go for the full gimbal head. Because of this, I’m not going to offer any advice about monopods. If or when I do start to use mine, I’ll be sure to give you a full run-down of my experiences.

In Closing

So, I hope this has been useful. I’ve tried to cover everything, but I know I’ve probably forgotten something. Also, if you aren’t a Canon shooter, I hope you were still able to gain something from this. Most systems have similar features, but the names are different, so you’ll need to reference your manual to figure out and translate this information to your own system. If there is something that you are still not sure about though, by all means, ask questions in the comments section below and I’ll try to help as best I can.

Show Notes

Really Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head on B&H: https://mbp.ac/rrspg02

Music by Martin Bailey

Audio

Subscribe in iTunes for Enhanced Podcasts delivered automatically to your computer.

Download this Podcast in MP3 format (Audio Only).

Download this Podcast in Enhanced Podcast M4A format. This requires Apple iTunes or Quicktime to view/listen.

Using Telephoto Lenses Successfully (Podcast 23)

by Martin Bailey | Feb 7, 2006 | Art Talk, Fundamentals, Podcast

Welcome to Episode 23 of the Martin Bailey Photography Podcast. Today I’m going to talk about what actually constitutes a telephoto lens, briefly touch on some general applications, and the difficulties we face when using medium to super-telephoto lenses. I’ll also introduce some techniques to help overcome these difficulties. Thanks to Marisa, one of the long time contributors in the MBP forum, for suggesting the topic for this week’s Podcast. Also congratulations Marisa on getting your Canon EOS 350D Digital Rebel and the 70-300mm IS lens.

I’d also like to say thanks to everyone for your patience during the upgrade of the online gallery and forum over the last week or so. If anyone comes to the site after a period away and you have any problems logging in, please try to clear your cookie cache to get rid of the cookie from the old version and try again. That should do it, but if you continue to have problems, please mail me from the Contact Form.

So firstly, let’s define what actually constitutes a telephoto lens. On a 35mm format SLR camera, a 50mm lens is considered “standard”. That is, it does not magnify or de-magnify the subject. Strictly speaking, any focal length shorter than 50mm is wide angle, and anything longer than 50mm is telephoto. I’m sure there are varying opinions on this, but generally, from 60mm to 100mm could be termed “short telephoto”, a 200mm lens would be considered “medium-telephoto” and a 300mm long telephoto. Anything from 400mm and above is considered super-telephoto.

There are of course prime lenses at many of these focal lengths, and there are zoom lenses, such as the 70-300mm lens that Marisa just bought, that cover wide ranges from the short to long telephoto ranges. There are even lenses nowadays, such as Canon’s 28-300mm L lens that covers from wide angle to long telephoto, but obviously the price is not to be sniffed at either. Prime lenses will provide better quality images, but they lack the flexibility of zoom lenses and for the majority of applications, the image quality with the zoom lenses is more than enough.

Whether zoom or prime, telephoto lenses have many applications, including shooting things far away allowing you to get in closer to them, such as cutting out the parts of a landscape that interest you, as I discussed in Episode #8 on Composition, called Getting in Close in Landscapes, but can also seen in many shots in my online gallery. Another, and perhaps more common application is for capturing things that might not necessarily be so far away, such as birds, but capturing them large enough in the frame to be able to make out fine detail in the subject, or maybe even sometimes filling the frame with the subject. Yet another application is to shoot things quite close to you, often in my case very close to the minimum focusing distance, filling the frame with the subject.

As I mentioned, there are difficulties when using telephoto lenses. The most serious issue that you really need to bear in mind is that the longer the focal length the more susceptible to camera shake your images will be. This is because you are magnifying the subject more and more as the focal length increases, and so magnifying any movement in the camera and lens when shooting it. Therefore, the degree to which you need to worry about this also becomes greater as the focal length increases.

From episode 1 of this Podcast, a number of times I’ve mentioned a rule of thumb to calculate the minimum shutter speed to help avoid camera shake when hand-holding. I haven’t mentioned this for some time now though, so let’s go over it again quickly. Basically you use the focal length you are shooting at as the slowest shutter speed. This is independent of ISO or aperture, but you do need to work in the crop factor if you are using a digital SLR that has one. Say for example you are using a 100mm lens. The slowest shutter speed you should aim for is 1/100 of a second. If you are using a DSLR with a 1.6 crop factor, the effective focal length is 160mm so your slowest advisable shutter speed would 1/160 of a second. If you have a camera with a 1.5 or 1.3 crop factor, this will make a 100mm lens 150 or 130mm respectively, and the slowest advisable shutter speed of course changes respectively.

If you are using your lens at 300mm on a 1.6 crop factor camera, that’s an effective focal length of 480, so you’ll need a minimum shutter speed of 1/500 of a second. Remember this is only a rule, and there are things that you can do to lower the risk of camera shake, such as those explained in Episode 2 on Stable Posture in Low Light. This will also vary from person to person. Some people can simply physically hold a camera more steadily than others.

Another factor that we must bear in mind here is that many lenses nowadays come with IS, that is Image Stabilizer for Canon and VR or Vibration Reduction for Nikon. This can reduce your necessary minimum shutter speed by up to 3 stops, and for the Nikon VRII system it seems up to four stops. So say you are shooting at 300mm, usually this would need a minimum shutter speed of 1/500 of a second on a 1.6 crop factor DSLR, but if you turn on Image Stabilizer, that becomes as low as 1/60 of a second if your IS gives you three stops. Remember to calculate the time you gain per stop, simply double the shutter speed for each stop. When we’re working in fractions of a second, that basically means halving the number. The first stop from 1/500 of a second takes you to 1/250 of a second. The second stop takes you from 1/250 of a second to 1/125 of a second, and the third stop takes you from 1/125 to 1/60 of a second. If you get four stops from your lenses image stabilizer, that would give you an amazing 1/30 of a second. Of course, this is all based on the example of 1/500 of a second, and this will change depending on your focal length and amount of available light.

If you are still a little shaky on calculating how much time a stop will increase or decrease your shutter speeds or aperture value, or both, take another listen to episode 10 of this Podcast on Exposure and Manual Mode. This Podcast is pretty heavy going, but should help you to understand how to calculate increases or reductions shutter speed and or aperture in stops to achieve the same Exposure Value.

Now, in theory, you could go down to shutter speeds as slow as this with a 300mm lens, but I my experience, relying on IS or VR will only prove successful some of the time. For still subjects the success rate will be higher, but in wildlife photography for example your subject will also more than likely be moving. It’s no use shooting animals at 1/60 of a second as they are likely to move during that time, even just very slightly, and that will cause motion blur in the subject.

Of course, another option to avoid camera shake when using telephoto lenses is to use a tripod. I know that many people shy away from using a tripod unless absolutely necessary, but using one will without a doubt improve your images. It will also help you to be more methodical in your composition and perhaps improve composition too, but that’s going off topic a little.

Using a tripod is not going to solve all ills though. There are times when you can’t use a tripod, say if there are rules against using a tripod in the location you’re shooting from. Also, for many situations, such as wildlife photography when the subject might be moving around a lot, using a tripod can restrict your movement. Both of yourself physically moving around and the movement of the camera, even from a static position, and this can limit your ability to successfully capture your subject on film. If there is enough available light, I personally like to use up to 400mm hand-held for this reason. And of course, as I mentioned earlier, in wildlife photography or any type of photography where the subject can move around, subject movement will cause problems if you go with too slow a shutter speed. If you are shooting birds in flight for instance, you really want to aim for a minimum shutter speed as calculated by the rule of thumb I mentioned earlier, or maybe one stop slower if you are using IS, especially when using super-telephoto lenses of 400mm and longer. Much slower than that and your success rate is going to drop dramatically.

If there is simply not enough available light to enable us to get a fast enough shutter speed we need to start thinking of other options. The first thing you’ll want to think of is raising the ISO. Most cameras will start to introduce grain from around 400 ISO though, especially in the shadows, so you don’t want to rely on this too much.

Also popping in a little fill-in flash or using a reflector may be an option if your subject is in range. The range of your flash will depend on the guide number. You can usually check the distance your flash will reach in the instruction manual. There are actually zooms available that you fit on to the front of your flash that project the light further than normal. One I’ve heard of but do not yet use myself is the BetterBeamer. Apparently the Better Beamer will add approximately 2-stops of light output to your flash by concentrating the light emitted and is recommended for use with telephoto lenses of a focal length of 300mm or longer. This and loads of other great photography gadgets can be bought from the naturephotographers.net gift shop. I will add a link to the show notes in case you’re interested.

Even having when putting all of this into practice you’d be well advised to shoot in bursts when using long lenses. That is, don’t just take one shot then wait for your subject to change position or you yourself move on to another location, take bursts for 3 shots or more. I don’t mean for exposure bracketing. I’m talking about with the same settings. What you usually find is that the bird moves at exactly the time one of your exposures is made, or you get camera shake that affects some, but not all shots. If you take a minimum of three frames, more if possible, you give yourself a better chance of getting a winner out of the batch. I often find, especially when shooting birds in flight, at least half of the resulting shots are too soft to be of any use. You’ll probably also find that shooting single shots will introduce a snappy movement, that you can avoid by simply keeping the shutter button pressed for a number of frames, allowing you to concentrate on tracking the subject.

Before we move on to another problem you may not be used to if you are new to longer telephoto lenses, there’s a lot talk happening here, without much to look at, so let’s take a look at a photo I made last Sunday, that is February 5^th, 2006. It is shot number 834, which is of a Whooper Swan cygnet about to touch down on the Kotokunuma Pond in Ibaraki Prefecture, a couple of hours north of Tokyo. This shows the results of putting much of what I’ve just said in practice. The sun was now behind some trees, almost below the horizon, so the cygnet was in total shadow. I was using a super-telephoto lens. The Canon EF 600mm F4 IS USM L lens and had the ISO set to 400. The aperture was F8, just about enough to get the entire bird in the depth of field and the shutter speed was 1/500 of a second. I had IS turned on, and was using mode 2, which will only stabilize horizontal or vertical movement, allowing me to track with the swan and not have the lens try to stabilize the whole scene.

I should just mention that I was using a tripod. It really is just not possible to hand hold this behemoth of a lens. Earlier I mentioned that I like to hand hold up to 400mm when there’s enough light, because it gives you more freedom of movement. To help me when using this 600mm lens, I use a Wimberley Head on my Gitzo tripod. The Wimberley Head uses gimbal-type design that allows you to rotate your lens around its center of gravity, and is really the closest you can get to the freedom of hand holding with a lens this size.

If you are not shooting wildlife or sports shots where the subject is moving, you can of course use a tripod and go to much slower shutter speeds. I’m really focusing here on the difficulties when shooting things that may move.

So, moving on, the second thing you’ll need to bear in mind when using a telephoto lens is that the depth-of-field gets shallower and shallower as the focal length gets longer. I shot the image that I just introduced of the swan coming in to land at F8. I could have possibly gone to F5.6, but at the distance I shot this at, which was probably about 20 meters or 65 feet, I’d have ended up with a depth-of-field of just 40cms or 12 inches, and with a bird this size, that would have meant that the wings were quite out of focus. Even at the aperture I chose, F8, I only have 57cms or just over 18 inches of DOF, but this is just about enough to get most of the bird in acceptable focus.

Also note that the closer the subject is, the shallower the depth-of-field gets. And likewise, the further away the subject, the deeper the depth-of-field gets. I’ll add a link to an online depth-of-field calculator to the show notes, so you can have a play and see the relationship between the focal length, aperture, distance to subject and size of the film or sensor. This calculator actually gives slightly different results to that of the one I have installed on my computer, and I don’t know which is more accurate, but it is going to be accurate enough to give you an idea of what I’m talking about.

Basically, what I’m getting at here is that when using telephoto lenses, you have to be much more conscious of the widest aperture you can shoot at and still have enough depth of field to get your subject in focus. Of course, the benefits of this are that it is really easy to get the background out of focus enough to stop it from being a distraction. If the background is not distracting though, it is often nice to be able to make out the environment of your subject if it’s a wildlife shot. Take a quick look at shot number 830 on my Web site. This is a Black Kite also shot last Sunday, at probably three times the distance of the last image, at about 60 meters or almost 200 feet. I actually cropped a little, about 20% off the left and 15% off the bottom, of this shot, so the bird is a little larger in the frame than the original. This was shot at F5.6, which is plenty at this distance to get the smaller bird of prey totally in focus, but you’ll see that the background is quite out of focus. You can though make out the environment enough to know that there are trees and hills in the background. This again was at ISO 400, and the shutter speed was 1/800 of a second.

So, that is about it for today’s episode. To briefly recap; the longer the lens, the shallower the depth of field and the higher the risk of camera shake. Use the rule of thumb to determine your slowest advisable shutter speed based on your focal length, and bear in mind not to blindly rely on image stabilizer systems when your subject is moving around.

If you are interested to see any of the other images from the Kotokunuma Pond last Sunday shot with the 600mm F4 lens, I’ll drop a link into the show notes to list them all. There’re just six of them. Next week I’ll be following on from this episode, talking about Extenders as Canon terms them, or Teleconverters. These allow you to increase the focal length of your lenses relatively cheaply, but, at a cost. Tune in next week to find out more.

Enjoy your week, and keep on shooting. Bye Bye!

BetterBeamer: https://mbp.ac/bhbb

You can also check out the other great gadgets at the naturephotographers.net gift shop here: http://www.naturephotographers.net/gs.html

Check out the Wimberley Head that I use primarily for long lenses when using a tripod here: http://www.tripodhead.com/

Here is a link to an online Depth-of-Field calculator to have a play with and see the relationship between the focal length, aperture, distance to subject and size of the film or sensor: http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Audio

Subscribe in iTunes for Enhanced Podcasts delivered automatically to your computer.

Download this Podcast in MP3 format (Audio Only).